learning from stories of compound wealth * widespread human progress

(under reconstruction after a google meltdown -please excuse our mess and a few missing links)...if you need guiding around deeper cases urgently, mail me at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk

-also please see our latest stories on Norman macrae and THErebelECONOMIST, Entrepreneurial Revolution readers circles since 1976 and the learning game ValueCity

Google, The Economist & SW Airlines provide stories and maps of how 100-win returns were compounded over a generation - 100 times the true investors original stake and order of magnitude more economic wealth and health for all the societal stakeholders and customers integrated by such hi-trust and purposeful organisational systems of productivities and demands

Creative*Administrative -leadership needs to return from the brink of complexity to transparent simplicity. Faciliating deep gravitational contexts of productive*demanding relationships is the mathematical way ahead

Whilst most value multiplies around sector-specific leadership by, for and with society, two general pattern rules of purposefully sustainable systems of productivities and demands are

• Control advertising for the sake of your organisational system's unique character, never let advertising's spiralling costs control your destiny
• Control measurement's specificity and compound future timelining, never let measurement standards take over leadership's future love of suitably innovative systemisation nor your knowledge worker's trust-flows. Do not distract attention to making past quarters look perfectly controlled, however much professional advice on this surrounds - let alone bombards - the boardroom

Networks: Today's System Times System Crisis

100-win or 100-lose is also the potential outcome of any merger & acquisition with global and local consequences , as well as all sorts of new networking interactions of service and knowledge co-worker economies. It's important to explore understanding of some of the definitve cases first, then to debate what analogies translate. Above all, 100-win is a very context enrichening game that leaders of hi-trust human relationships systems relentlessly develop.

These are not games that work out well behind closed doors- the best are played in the most open and public ways - vote for which global market sectors get or fail to get this at FantasyWealth (game in press) or if its less controversial start by scripting your dream view of a how a city's unique culture could collaborate in 100-win exchanges with other cities and villages who could most simply replicate the same learnings and actions (like a franchise that gets stronger the more people who learn with it -eg english language, open source sotfware etc -there's a very big contextual difference between what multiplies in use and what gets consumed up; isn't it dismal how much 20th C strategy/economics and accounting is based on consumed up scarcity rather than value multiplying abundance? Unless everyone who invests in sustaining societies and fellow human being dare explore this question now, our 21 year research curve suggests that globalisation will compound smaller global footprints, and all the terror and speculative greed that such dis-trust spreads like an organisational cancer )

Co-edited blogs include:
valueten - one system
economicstimes - evaluate risks then multiply opportunities
exponentials
holonetwork
intangibles-valuation : how trust-flow maths connects humanly oppoiste relations than money numbers separate
system constructs need to interface each other
preneurial revolution story circles since 1976
Death of Distance Future History scripts since 1984
THErebelECONOMISTInvitations of Democracy Cubed issued at Washington DC and other Club of City and Club of Country including this open travel guide to hi-trust movements out of USA

# posted by macrae.nets : 8:51 AM 0 comments
Not all of the greatest wealth compounded through the future history of our race originated from individuals concerned to multiply financial investment. Indeed probably the majority of largest value multiplications attributable to individuals' lives came from those who were interested in the societal returns of what they passionately knew how to do (The Mother Theresa's) or stand for (The Gandhi's and Livingstones) or truth's revolutionary mapmakers like Von Neumann or Einstein, or those who have made our lives better through great inventions or deep cultural meaningPlease tell us who you would like to see catalogued in the societal multiplier category of history as well as those living today. Another special category that interests us is people we call Deep Voices. Think of any industry sector: who is the person that 6 billion beings around the world should most trust about that sector's compound good or bad impacts for societies? Often this will be a person who has spent much of their life trying to clean up wrong crossroads that parts of the industry sector has systemically taken so that societies of the future will not be harmed. They are usually not people that the mass media celebrates, at least not during their lifetimes. This makes it all the more important that intercitizens media like blogworld map out who the deepest voices for the futures sectors are compounding across societies have greater share of voice than those whose only image-make with what a sector does.We see nothing wrong in transparent surveys of the 100 people who amassed the greatest financial fortunes, except that as the network age multuiplies we desperately seek as much attention neing focused on enabling us all to see the second catalogue of the 100 people who connected the most people in endeavours that compound human progress way into the future. These greatest social networkers would have different lessons for our children to learn from than those who use money as the ultimate yardstick, let alone those who use the measure of how much money did you take from the world in the last quarter. In true preneurial bibles, systeming and sustaining strong societal trust-flows is what compounds sustained investment returns not the other way round. No need to take my word for this- Peter Drucker made this clearer than any management expert of the 20th Century.

# posted by macrae.nets : 4:18 AM 0 comments
Dear Traci & Rita (Democratic Corp Unis) and Robert & Rick (Clean Energisers for Sustainability Investment Funds)I want to approach a couple of leading companies in hotel sector with the idea that if tourism and business is to earn thye bigger footprint that planes etc require, then a couple of global hotel chains could take a lead with an inspiration exhibition roomHere guests could leave something of themselves behind; see what the most urgent projects of local need were ; find a one-page brochure on all clean energy inventions being trailled; have web access to maps of who's testing whatIs this an idea you feel like connecting with? And who should I approach first. I will probably try knocking on the door of Marriott and Club Med because their cultures and locations feel right. But in terms of breaking through, my contacts are cold. At some stage one might organsise city cafes and make it clear to top hotel managers they are only invvited once for free into this sustainbility of hotels modelchrishttp://value100.blogspot.comI am also hatching a series of concepts which are a bottom-up way in to collaboration corporate universities now I realise tehse are the only way we will plant preneurial and organsaitional democracy dynamics and value100 fast enough given we have 4.75 years and ticking to sustain our biggest collaboration goalsOnce we are the right flightpath, many other goodnews channels interface including:carnivalisationfoundationjam as a second wave of Canada's www.habitatjam.com and Delhi's 2007 congress for Gandhi trust-testing community developers as well as Qutopia's main guest assembly pavillion
# posted by macrae.nets : 5:47 AM 0 comments

Can countries sustain the rising exponentials of value100?Yes of course - they can. The simplest cass to study are relatively small and focused (such as the Tigers of taiwan and Singapore)Japan Inc was studied for 25 years circa 1955-1980 in my father's work at The Economist 1 2. On retirement, he was awarded a higher honor by Japan than Britain or his profession - for enabling us to see our globalsiation as a more noble colaboration than just agressive competition of nations. Japan Inc invented the most purposeful Corporate Brand Architectures yet chartered as an identity that wen beyond consensus to hi-trust inspiriation- how Canon, Sony, Toyota and Honda to name but 4 seemed all at the same time quintessentially Global, Japanese, and loving to improve what theior product quality revolved around for all they multiplied value with.Globalisation's systemic game of goodwill wars 1 2 will be won by 2024 if the world enjoys seeing mega-countries like India and China compound 10 to 100 exponentials (we note that 10 fold exponentials are often safer to cooperative multiply with unless your people really need 100 fold so fast). The lesson to keep to heart is that nobody need ever lose by more of the 6 billion people around teh world becoming productive; any leader who says that connecting more people in greater productivity will harm his peoples is saying this because he or she is not compounding a long-term win-win-win game through being muddled by some short-term fears or wholly meaningless conflicts. Since 1984 we have tracked whether our race will sustain this coming century with many who ask you to question the world in wholes before you try to be analytically certain about parts. The final outcome will be experienced by your daughters or grandsons but the final forecast depends on what we all decide to collaborate in doing by 2015 as the pattern of globalisation people and nature will by then irreversibly be spinning.

# posted by ... @ 8:45 AM 0 comments